Assessment Criteria #
With your Extended Essay, you can earn a maximum of 34 points, distributed across five different criteria that assess various components of your work:
Criterion A: Focus and method | Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding | Criterion C: Critical thinking | Criterion D: Presentation | Criterion E: Engagement |
---|---|---|---|---|
- Topic - Research question - Methodology | - Context - Subject-specific terminology and concepts | - Research - Analysis - Discussion and evaluation | - Structure - Layout | - Process - Research focus |
Marks | Marks | Marks | Marks | Marks |
6 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 6 |
Total marks: 34
This section focuses on how to master specific criteria and is tailored toward Computer Science. For a more general and in-depth overview refer to the Extended Essay Guide.
Content overview: #
Criterion A: Focus and method #
Strands: Topic
, Research question
, Methodology
Clear Title Focus:
- Title should prominently feature the computer science aspect of the research.
Avoid ITGS, Broad, and Futuristic Topics:
- Ensure your topic aligns with computer science rather than leaning towards social aspects suited for ITGS.
- Be cautious of selecting overly broad topics that may lead to a superficial treatment within the word limit.
- Steer clear of speculative or futuristic topics that often result in opinion-based essays lacking substantial factual support.
Sharp and Accessible Research Question:
- Ensure a well-focused research question that allows for in-depth exploration within the 4,000-word limit and is suitable for an IB student’s understanding.
- Clearly state the research question as a question in the introduction, providing context for the areas investigated.
Justification for Topic:
- Explain why the chosen topic and research question are suitable and significant for an Extended Essay. Provide sufficient background information related to the chosen topic.
Transparent Methodology:
- Clearly describe the methodology to be employed in answering the research question.
- Consider incorporating experimental or programming elements with valuable data sources, avoiding reliance on small-scale surveys from fellow students.
Well-Planned Essay:
- Ensure a well-structured and planned essay that draws from authoritative sources, including internet, literature, and expert interviews.
Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding #
Strands: Context
, Subject-specific terminology and concepts
Demonstrate Personal Understanding:
- Showcase your comprehension of the chosen topic, avoiding reliance on reworded source material.
- Provide clarifications or simplified explanations of technical information, always linking it back to the original research question.
Strategic Use of Source Material:
- Select and incorporate source material to illustrate the knowledge you gained in relation to the chosen topic.
Technical Language Appropriateness:
- Employ a technical language suitable for computer science, ensuring clarity that reflects the student’s understanding.
- Avoid excessive technicality, considering that the reader may not be an expert in the specific addressed topic.
Criterion C: Critical thinking #
Strands: Research
, Analysis
and Discussion and evaluation
Logical Argument Development:
- Develop a logically flowing argument throughout the essay.
Selective and Critical Use of Information:
- Select information directly relevant to the research question, avoiding an excessive number of sources.
- Evaluate the relevance, necessity, and validity of sources.
Thorough Analysis and Conclusions:
- Draw conclusions throughout the essay, not solely in the concluding section.
- Analyze tables and graphs, going beyond translation to explain the underlying reasons for the obtained results.
Comprehensive Final Conclusions:
- Final conclusions should extend beyond summarizing, presenting a justified answer to the original research question.
- Indicate potential areas for future research to explore unanswered questions or expand the essay’s original scope.
Criterion D: Presentation #
Strands: Structure
, Layout
Use of Charts, Images, and Tables:
- Carefully select and label charts, images, and tables from literature sources.
- Include large tables of raw data you collected in the appendix, carefully labeled.
- Design tables of processed data to clearly display relevant information in the most appropriate form.
- Limit the use of graphs, charts, and tables to enhance the written explanation without overwhelming the communication.
Acknowledgment and Referencing:
- Acknowledge and reference any non-original material, including audio-visual material, text, graphs, and data.
- Follow proper referencing standards, including the name of the author, date of publication, title of the source, and page numbers.
Bibliography, Structure, and Presentation:
- Include a bibliography in a standard format.
- Ensure the title page, table of contents, and page numbers contribute to the overall quality of presentation.
- Follow accepted academic standards for research paper presentation.
- Consider using a section and sub-section structure with informative headings.
Word Limit and Exclusions:
- Keep the essay narrative within the 4,000-word limit.
- Note that graphs, figures, calculations, diagrams, formulas, and equations are not included in the word count.
- Examiners will not read beyond the 4,000-word limit, and no assessment will be made on material presented thereafter.
Criterion E: Engagement #
Strands: Reflections on planning and progress
The assessment of this criterion is based on the RPPF, which you complete after submitting your Extended Essay.
Decision-Making and Planning:
- Reflect on how you arrived at the chosen topic.
- Explore the methods and approach you used in completing the essay.
- Assess the rationale for decisions you made throughout the planning process.
- Provide insight into your thinking, creativity, and originality in the research process.
Critical and Effective Reflection:
- Show evidence of critical and reflective thinking that goes beyond procedural descriptions.
- Explore setbacks you faced in research and how you overcame them.
- Reflect on questions that emerged as a result of the research.
- Consider what you would do differently if undertaking the research again.
- Ensure your voice is clearly present and demonstrates the learning that has taken place.